Support

We're here to help you get the most out of Truestamp. Find answers to common questions or get in touch with our support team.

Community & Updates

Share feedback, follow what we're building next, and see what just shipped. Each opens right here in a popup, so no separate account is needed.

Knowledge Base

Browse the concepts behind Truestamp. Pick a domain to explore, follow the links between concepts, or search across everything.

Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System

Satoshi Nakamoto's 2008 Bitcoin whitepaper: a trustless peer-to-peer cash system using a proof-of-work timestamp server, hash-chained blocks, and Merkle trees to prevent double-spending.

Open resource

Overview

“Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System” is the founding 2008 whitepaper by Satoshi Nakamoto ([email protected], www.bitcoin.org) that introduced Bitcoin. It proposes a purely peer-to-peer form of electronic cash that lets two parties transact directly without a trusted financial intermediary. Its central contribution is a decentralized solution to the double-spending problem: a network timestamps transactions by hashing them into an ongoing chain of hash-based proof-of-work, producing a public transaction history that cannot be altered without redoing all subsequent work. The system replaces institutional trust with cryptographic proof, and remains secure as long as honest nodes collectively control a majority of CPU power.

Key points

  • Coins are modeled as a chain of digital signatures: each owner transfers a coin by signing a hash of the previous transaction plus the next owner’s public key, letting any payee verify the chain of ownership.
  • A distributed timestamp server hashes a block of items and chains each timestamp into the previous one; because publishing proves the data existed at that time, the chain reinforces every earlier record. This section directly generalizes prior digital time-stamping work by Haber and Stornetta.
  • Proof-of-work (a Hashcash-style search for a SHA-256 hash with a required number of leading zero bits) makes consensus “one-CPU-one-vote”; the longest chain represents the majority decision and is expensive to rewrite. Difficulty auto-adjusts via a moving average targeting a fixed number of blocks per hour.
  • Block transactions are hashed into a Merkle tree with only the root stored in the block header, so spent transactions can be pruned to reclaim disk space; a block header runs about 80 bytes, and Simplified Payment Verification (SPV) lets lightweight clients verify using only headers plus a Merkle branch.
  • Incentives (a coinbase block reward plus transaction fees) fund honest participation and coin issuance without a central authority, aligning a would-be attacker’s economics toward playing by the rules.
  • A Gambler’s Ruin / Poisson analysis shows an attacker’s probability of overtaking the honest chain drops exponentially with the number of confirmation blocks z; the paper tabulates, for example, that at q=0.1 an attacker’s catch-up probability falls below 0.1% by z=5.

Relevance to Truestamp

The whitepaper’s timestamp-server and Merkle-tree constructions are direct antecedents of Truestamp’s design: transactions hashed into a per-block Merkle tree with only the root committed into a hash-chained ledger. Truestamp records its block hashes onto the public Bitcoin blockchain as an external block commitment, inheriting Bitcoin’s proof-of-work immutability to prove a Truestamp block existed before a given point in time. See also the item vs block commitment distinction and the Bitcoin glossary term.

Citations

  1. Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System. Satoshi Nakamoto, 2008 (9 pages, 8 references including Hashcash, Haber and Stornetta digital time-stamping, and Merkle).

Get Help

API Documentation

Comprehensive guides for the REST and GraphQL APIs, including interactive documentation and code examples.

View API Docs

FAQ

Quick answers to the most commonly asked questions about timestamping and verification.

Browse FAQ

Email Support

Send us a message and our team will respond within 24 hours.

[email protected]

Security Issues

Report security vulnerabilities through our responsible disclosure program.

[email protected]