Support

We're here to help you get the most out of Truestamp. Find answers to common questions or get in touch with our support team.

Community & Updates

Share feedback, follow what we're building next, and see what just shipped. Each opens right here in a popup, so no separate account is needed.

Knowledge Base

Browse the concepts behind Truestamp. Pick a domain to explore, follow the links between concepts, or search across everything.

The Inventor of Blockchain Would Like a Better Bitcoin

Blockworks interview with cryptographic-timestamping pioneer Scott Stornetta on Bitcoin's achievements and flaws: incomplete decentralization, mining incentives, lack of monetary privacy, and immutable record-keeping against AI deepfakes.

Open resource

Overview

A Blockworks news interview with W. Scott Stornetta, the cryptographer who, with Stuart Haber, developed the foundational digital-document timestamping techniques (their 1991 work “How to Time-Stamp a Digital Document”) that Satoshi Nakamoto cited in the Bitcoin whitepaper. In the piece Stornetta credits Bitcoin as a landmark achievement in tying an immutable, tamper-evident record to a working financial system, while arguing its design falls short of the fully peer-to-peer, decentralized vision it aspires to. He frames both its strengths and its unfinished business, and connects his lifelong work on immutable records to newer problems such as detecting AI-generated deepfakes.

Key points

  • Stornetta is widely recognized as a co-inventor of the cryptographic techniques underlying blockchain: hash-linked, tamper-evident records of digital documents predating Bitcoin by nearly two decades.
  • He praises Bitcoin for successfully coupling an immutable ledger to real economic incentives, but contends its decentralization is incomplete because mining economics concentrate power and create barriers to true peer-to-peer participation.
  • He critiques Bitcoin’s monetary privacy: its transparent, fully public ledger works against the anonymity expected of digital cash, since transactions can be traced.
  • He advocates a more thorough, “atomic” form of decentralization as a direction for improving on Bitcoin’s model.
  • He connects immutable record-keeping to contemporary challenges, notably establishing provenance and authenticity to counter AI-generated deepfakes and synthetic media.

Relevance to Truestamp

Stornetta’s hash-linked timestamping is the conceptual root of what Truestamp does: proving that data existed and was submitted at a point in time via tamper-evident cryptographic records, independent of any single chain. His deepfake-provenance framing aligns with Truestamp’s focus on what Truestamp proves, and his critique of Bitcoin as one ledger among many mirrors Truestamp’s use of Bitcoin as one external commitment target rather than the sole root of trust.

Citations

  1. The Inventor of Blockchain Would Like a Better Bitcoin. Blockworks interview with W. Scott Stornetta; page returned HTTP 403 to automated fetch, so this summary draws on the title, an independent third-party summary, and established public knowledge of Stornetta’s Haber-Stornetta timestamping work.

Get Help

API Documentation

Comprehensive guides for the REST and GraphQL APIs, including interactive documentation and code examples.

View API Docs

FAQ

Quick answers to the most commonly asked questions about timestamping and verification.

Browse FAQ

Email Support

Send us a message and our team will respond within 24 hours.

[email protected]

Security Issues

Report security vulnerabilities through our responsible disclosure program.

[email protected]